In the past couple of days, a smattering of i9-11900K, i7-11700K, and i5-11500 Geekbench scores have entered the scene. Intel’s flagship waded into the foray of the leaderboards. Though it’s difficult to tell, it looks as if the 11900K is only beat by processors running a different operating system or using an extreme overclock.
To frame the scene, a Ryzen R9 5950X typically gets 1682 points in the single-core test, and the 10900K, 1402. The upcoming 11900K got 1892, a 35% generational leap and a 12% advantage over the Ryzen part. The 11700K was only a hair behind, with four scores at about the 1810 mark.
As we’ve mentioned before, Intel’s upcoming Core i7 and i9 processors will be an 8-core affair, only, so their multi-core scores aren’t stellar, but they’re good for the core count. The 11900K got 10934, while the 11700K ranged from 10639 to 11287. AMD’s octa-core 5800X is slightly behind with 10426 points, while the current 10-core 10900K lands in between with 10930 points.
The Asus ROG Strix Z590-E Gaming WIFI, a next-gen motherboard
There’s been concern that the 11900K’s eight cores could fall behind the 10900K’s ten. The good news (though it sounds silly) is that these results say that the 11900K will be better than the 10900K in every way, as a successor should be. But… all that performance goodness could be soured by a high price, according to some info from last weekend.
More appealing could be the 11700K. It looks like it’ll be cheaper and faster than the 10900K. And compared to the 11900K, it should be considerably more affordable and almost as powerful — during the tests, the 11700K ran at 5 GHz, an insignificant notch down from the 11900K’s 5.3 GHz. Nothing a little overclock wouldn’t fix, anyway.
Rounding out the tail of the series are scores from the i5-11500 and i5-11400. Both are 6-core and 12-thread parts. The former ran at 4.6 GHz and the latter at 4.4 GHz. The 11500’s single-core score of 1588 was 35% above its predecessor’s, while its multi-core score was 20% higher. The 11400’s scores were 10% higher than the 10400’s.
At the reported prices of $240 and $225, these two chips should be pretty interesting. If they’re priced any higher, though, they’ll butt up against the 5600X, which is already faster than both.